Adobe Audition Vs Apple Logic Pro

broken image


Avid Pro Tools and Adobe Audition, two of the well-known DAW (Digital Audio Workstation) software in the music industry, their main difference seems to be one looks more ‘industrial standard', and one sounds typically as the Adobe Premiere's auxiliary audio modification program (e.g. Audio effects & noise remover). As I had a 1 year experience of using Audition and a 2 month one for Pro Tools that I just learnt it from my Sound Design elective, which would I prefer for our final project's editing?

Apples and oranges. You can't compare the two. FL is a DAW - Digital Audio Workstation. This means that you can use it to record audio and MIDI, so you can set it up with a range of samplers, synths and other. Logic Pro X is a must for Mac-based music production, recording, and mixing environments. But Logic's tools and interface just make sense to anyone who is familiar with Apple products and music tools. Read full review. Michael Anderson. A cursory search for known issues in Adobe Audition. Along with tools for color, audio, and graphics, Premiere Pro works seamlessly with other apps and services, including After Effects, Adobe Audition, and Adobe Stock. Open a Motion Graphics template from After Effects or download one from Adobe. Adobe Audition vs Logic Pro X When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Logic Pro X easier to use, administer, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Adobe Audition. Reviewers felt that Logic Pro X. Adobe Audition vs Logic Pro X When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Logic Pro X easier to use, administer, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Adobe Audition. Reviewers felt that Logic Pro X meets the needs of their business better than Adobe Audition.

Loading Screen

cr. Pro Tools Expert

Let start with the very beginning, their loading screen. Pro Tools had only applied 3 different colors, black as the background, with white and purple as the logo, text and loading bar, pretty dull and non-attractive, right? I guess its targeting user who doesn't really care about the appearance of a software (not me definitely), giving us the figure of a professional technician; In contrast, Audition had used dark green and tiffany green, a more ‘vitality' kind of color series as the theme of their loading screen, with a sound related picture (a pretty Gold one) to corporate with, the habit of Adobe when they had entered the CC era, seems to mainly target designers or some color-sensitive users. Software to read mac external hard drive on pc.

Interface

cr. 9to5mac

cr. keyword-suggestions

Next would be the interface. As what we have seen, Pro Tools had applied a light grey color tone to it, clearly shown the duration control and editing tools, with you could assign distinct colors to different tracks, giving us a colorful image which you would never be confused with what those tracks for. Macbook pro portuguese keyboard. The Audition, using a similar interface as Premiere and After Effects were, a dark grey color tone with deep track colors, with an extremely simple and tiny editing toolbar, which presenting an impression of cool and professional.

Track Types

cr. homestudiocorner (Pro Tools 8)

The final match, and the most important one, their Functions. Let's use track types as an example. In Pro Tools 12, there're 7 different types of track in total:

Audio

MIDI

Instrument

AUX (Auxiliary)

Audition Vs Pro Tools

Logic

Adobe Logic

VCA (stand for Voltage Control Amplifiers, a full name that hard to understand)

Master

Video (doesn't provide in Pro Tools First, the free version)

That made Pro Tools became a relatively complicated and advanced software in the world of audio editing, with different icons inserted in the mixer window, that could let us play virtual instruments with, send the same plug-in (with a cool name ‘AudioSuite') into different tracks, control a group of track's volume, etc. Regarding to Audition, there're 4 different clip types only: Audio, Bus (same as AUX), Master and the one for showing Video, which sounds having less functions than the other one. However, their variety of plugins doesn't have a large different, although Pro Tools had provided the more professional's to their users.

Besides the price that we haven't discussed, which isn't quite meaningful (Pro tools cost $299 in perpetual and Adobe Suite cost $16.99 monthly for students), I guess the Audition would be well enough for our PB4, as Pro Tools would be harder to be proficient with from the very basic, base on my personal experience, and plugins and effects in Audition would be satisfactory for a simple sound work, unless you're aiming for being more skillful in the audio field?

On the podcast, Ethan uses Adobe Audition for editing and I've been using Apple Logic Pro 9. With the new release of Logic Pro X, I considered switching to Audition so we were compatible. I'm not a fan of Adobe as a company who have a history of doing what's best for Adobe and not their customers.

Adobe wants to charge £17.58 per month or £210.96 per annum for their Audition on a subscription.

I can buy Logic Pro X outright for £139.99.

Adobe Audition Vs Apple Logic Pro 8

I expect Logic Pro X to have at least two year life which means £139 vs £421 is a huge difference in cost. I have no investment in either platform since podcast editing is reasonably straight forward. Not much magic happening.

Adobe Audition Vs Apple Logic Pro

Decision: My computer will continue to have zero Adobe products installed. It was a close call there for a few minutes. I'm nothing if not flexible though.





broken image